← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6508/2018dismiss for nonprosecution

Krishnadeo Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-03-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6508 of 2018 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Paswan son of Late Harkhu Paswan resident of village P.O. - Jharha, P.S. - Sarai Raman, District - Samastipur at present in Charge of Accountant cum Head Clerk Municipal Corporation Nagar Parishad DehriDalmianagar, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Secretary Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas. 5.

The Executive Officer, Officer Nagar Parishad, Dehri-On-Sone-Dalmia Nagar, Dehri On Sone, Rohtas.

6.

The Chairman Municipal Commissioner, Board Nagar Parishad DehriDalmianagar, Dehri On Sone, Rohtas. 7.

Ashok Kumar S/o Late Uttam Singh L.D.C. Municipal Corporation DehriDalmia Nagar, Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha -AAG7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-03-2024 None appears on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned counsel for the State is present.

2. On 26.02.2024, the following order has been passed :- "Upon repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner however, counsel for the State is present.

2. As a matter of last indulgence, this case is adjourned for one week.

3. Put up this case on 06.03.2024. If on the said date, no one appears on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6508 of 2018(4) dt.06-03-2024 2/2 petitioner, appropriate order shall be passed."

4. Today also upon repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It appears to this Court that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any further.

5. As such, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U