← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39876/2024bail granted

Baby Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-03Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39876 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2023 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Baby Devi Wife of Devan Singh Resident of village - Sidhap Kala, P.S.- Ladania/ Ladaniya, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratnakar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024 Heard Mr. Ratnakar Jha, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with G.R. No. 1496 of 2023 arising out of Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 209 of 2023 for the offence registered under sections 143, 341, 323, 324, 307, 325, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 01.08.2023 by the informant, Dhukhi Singh.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that due to land dispute, firstly, the accused persons came, abused and later Devan Singh gave iron rod blow, causing injury on his left hand. When his son came to rescue, the son of Devan Singh, Ram Singh opened fire which hit the head of his son which proved fatal. He also opened fire hitting the informant on his right arm. The further allegation is that the informant's grand daughter was hit by one, Rakesh Singh by farsa, causing injury to her. This led to the F.I.R.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39876 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/3

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that a perusal of the F.I.R. would show that the main allegation is against Devan Singh of giving rod blow to the informant, Ram Singh of having opened fire, causing death to the informant's son as also injury to the informant and Rakesh Singh of injuring the grand daughter of the informant. There is no allegation against this petitioner whose name later came in the case diary in course of investigation. There is counter case also for the same occurrence.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail submitting that for a minor land dispute, the accused persons assaulted and son of the informant lost his life.

6. Though there has been a loss of life, the allegation is of opening fire is on Ram Singh, Devan Singh and Rakesh Singh have assaulted the informant's side, this petitioner has no role to play in the matter, she do not have criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to extend her privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. Let the petitioner in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39876 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IIIrd, Madhubani in connection with G.R. No. 1496 of 2023 arising out of Ladania/Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 209 of 2023 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(i) one of the bailor should be the family members/relatives of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial court itself;

(iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U T