Patna High CourtMJC/3333/2016disposed

Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra Prasad Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Vinay Kumar The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. O

2016-09-28Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3333 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1759 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra Prasad Singh son of Late Mishri Singh.

2. Umesh Singh son of Late Dasrath Singh.

3. Bidya Singh @ Bidya Bhusan Prasad Singh son of Ram Sanehi Singh.

4. Arjun Singh son of Late Chaturbhuj Singh.

5. Bhagwan Singh son of Late Banbari Singh.

6. Rajendra Singh son of Late Banbari Singh.

7. Ramashray Singh son of Late Dasrath Singh.

8. Gorelal Singh son of Late Brahamdev Singh.

9. Parmanand Singh son of Late Gobardhan Singh.

10. Saket Singh son of Late Geeta Singh.

11. Kailash Singh son of Late Basudev Singh.

All are residents of Village- Pali, P.S. Kashichak, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Vinay Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Kamlesh Chaudhary, the Chief Engineer, Department of Rural Works, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Md. Shahid Azam, the Executive Engineer, Works Division, Department of Rural Works, Nawada District Nawada.

4. Mr. Manoj Kumar, the Collector, Nawada.

5. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, the Sub- Divisional Officer, Nawada.

6. Mr. Amit Kumar, the Circle Officer, Kashichak, District Nawada. .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siya Ram Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nirbhay Prashant, AC to SC-17 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-09-2016 Final order has been passed by the Collector, Nawada in compliance of the order passed by this Court, as contained in Annexure-C to the affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 4 to

6. He has found that no part of the road has been constructed on the

Patna High Court MJC No.3333 of 2016 dt.28-09-2016 2/2 raiyati land of the petitioners.

In above view of the matter, in my considered opinion, the present proceeding cannot continue and, accordingly, the same is dropped.

However, the petitioners would be at liberty to assail the aforesaid order passed by the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nawada before a competent forum.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 3.10.2016 Transmission Date N.A.