Md Ainul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46242 of 2021 Arising Out of Case No.-336 Year-2012 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

MD AINUL HAQUE Son of Md. Sadique, Resident of Village - Bagaha, P.S.- Bagaha, Dist.- West Champaran 2.

Manoranjan Prasad Son of Late Dinesh Prasad @ Dnesh Lal Resident of Village - Bankatwa, P.S.- bagaha, Dist.- West Champaran, at Present Resident of Village - Fattu Chhapar Tola, Sudamanagar, P.s.- Bairiya, Dist.- west Champaran.

3.

Anuranjan Prasad Son of Late Dinesh Prasad @ Dinesh Lal Resident of Village - Bankatwa, P.S.- bagaha, Dist.- West Champaran, at Present Resident of Village - Fattu Chhapar Tola, Sudamanagar, P.s.- Bairiya, Dist.- west Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, these petitioners are alleged to have sold a piece of land in favour of complainant which was earlier sold to someone else.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46242 of 2021(4) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. It is submitted that petitioners No.2 and 3 are rightful owners of the land and they got the land through partition and they executed a sale deed in favour of complainant, which is clearly narrated in paragraph 7 of the sale deed dated 22.05.2010. The dispute is of civil nature. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateI, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Complaint case No.336C/2012, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T