Chhotelal Ram @ Chhotelal Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35728 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- West Champaran ====================================================== CHHOTELAL RAM @ CHHOTELAL DAS Son of Nathuni Das Resident of Village - Sirisiya, P.S.- Matiariya, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 28 of 2019 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 5 litres of liquor from the house of the petitioner and petitioner succeeded in fleeing away. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated and he has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that there is recovery from the house of the petitioner.

In view of above facts and circumstances, I am not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35728 of 2019(3) dt.13-08-2019 2/2 inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. If petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered and, if possible, to be disposed of on the same day, without being prejudiced by this order. With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T