Chandan Tanti @ Chandan Kumar Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45507 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2020 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== Chandan Tanti @ Chandan Kumar Tanti Son of Ratan Tanti Resident of Village- Pathakchak, P.S.- Sikandra, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

On secret information that 10-12 criminals were assembled at a lonely place and preparing to commit crime, a raid was conducted and five persons were apprehended who disclosed the name of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45507 of 2021(2) dt.15-04-2022 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. He submits that name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Surendra Mandal. He submits that petitioner was not arrested at the spot and nothing has been recovered from the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 110 of 2020 pending before the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T