Ravindra Kumar @ Ravin Yadav @ Robin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36190 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2021 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar @ Ravin Yadav @ Robin Yadav Son of Dhirendra Yadav R/O Ward 10, Shyam, P.S.- Gwalpara, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 4 of 2021 instituted for the offences under Sections 356, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and later on cognizance has been taken under Section 392 of the IPC.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that cash amounting to Rs. 98,600/- and one mobile phone was looted by unknown criminals.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case during investigation. No incriminating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36190 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/3 article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. Chargesheet has been submitted in this case. Learned counsel further submitted that one mobile phone has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2022 and has seven criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 4 of 2021, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36190 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T