Anmol Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37286 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2026 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== Anmol Kumar Son of Ramesh Yadav Resident of Village- Chamgadh Ward No. 09, P.S.- Murliganj, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 25.03.2026 in connection with R.S. P.S. Case No. 65 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 25.03.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Recovery is of 223.560 liters of English liquor.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it appears from the FIR as well as the seizure list that altogether 223.560 liters of Indian made foreign liquor was recovered from the vehicle in question and petitioner was apprehended at the place of occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is not the owner of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37286 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3 the vehicle in question and he has no concern at all with the alleged recovery of illicit liquor or the vehicle in question and police after investigation submitted the charge-sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2026.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one of similar nature but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in the said case, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise-I, Araria in connection with R.S. P.S. Case No. 65 of 2026, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37286 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3 for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T