Yugal Sao And ORS v. State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 387 of 2003 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- LAKHISARAI ========================================================

1. Yugal Sao.

2. Upendra Sao. Both are sons of Late Ramji Sao.

3. Bashishtha Kumar @ Anand Bashishtha. All resident of VillageSingarpur, P.S.-Lakhisarai (Chanan), District-Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ram Chandra Sahu, S/o Sri Saudagar Sahu, Resident of VillageSingarpur, P.O. Bichhway, P.S.-Lakhisarai, Distt.-Lakhisarai. .... .... Respondent/s ======================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kumar Pankaj, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Ms. Seema Kumari, Adv. ======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-06-2015 The Petitioners seek revision of the judgment of conviction dated 03.05.2003 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Munger in Criminal Appeal No. 130 of 2002, by which he has affirmed the judgment dated 05.09.2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Lakhisarai in G.R. No. 537 of 1988/240 of 2002, by which he has convicted the Petitioners under Sections 341 and 323 IPC and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for six months under each count.

Having gone through the impugned judgment of conviction, I do not find any perversity in the same and, hence, decline to interfere in the matter.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.387 of 2003 dt.29-06-2015 However, considering the period of custody and the date of occurrence, the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by the Petitioners.

With the aforesaid modification in sentence, the Revision Application stands dismissed.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T