Shashi Kant Kanoria v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secertary, Home, Govtt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.145 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2011 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== Shashi Kant Kanoria Son Of Sushil Kumar Kanoria Resident Of 3a Sinheshwar Palace, East Boring Canal Road, P.S. Buddha Colony, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secertary, Home, Govtt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Home, Govtt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. BIhar.

3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. Bihar 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Patna. Bihar 5.

The Officer In Charge, Patliputra Police Station, Patna. Bihar. 6.

The SBPDCL, through its Managing Director, Second Floor, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 800001. Bihar 7.

The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electivity Supply Sub- Division Patliputra. Bihar 8.

The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electivity Supply Sub- Division Patliputra. Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash Shekhar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv.

For the S.B.P.D.C.L.

:

Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Adv : Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Adv.

:

Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 11-05-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned Sr. Counsel Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh alongwith Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Adv. for the South Bihar Power Distribution Corporation Limited are present. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Cr. Writ Application, on this background

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.145 of 2021(7) dt.11-05-2023 2/2 that the trial was advanced and in the trial the discharge petition has been rejected thereafter, petitioner has preferred quashing application before this Court in which he has been granted interim protection.

Permission granted.

Accordingly, the present Cr. Writ Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ravishankar/- U T