Chandan Kumar Singh @ Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35832 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2018 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH @ CHANDAN SINGH S/o Kisun Singh R/O Village- Raghopur Naya Tola, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali. 2.

Kisun Singh S/O Late Narayan Singh R/O Village- Raghopur Naya Tola, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-12-2019 At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present bail petition qua the petitioner no. 1. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as not pressed as far as the petitioner no. 1 is concerned. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is that the marriage of the daughter of the informant had taken place twenty years ago with one Prem

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35832 of 2019(7) dt.10-12-2019 2/3 Singh, who had died one year back and thereafter, the accused persons had connived together and killed the daughter of the informant and thrown her in the river with a view to grab the share of the deceased in her ancestral property. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a bare perusal of the case diary would show that as far as the petitioner no. 2 is concerned, he is father of the petitioner no. 1, and has got no role to play in the alleged incident and if at all, any suspicion has been raised, it is against the petitioner no. 1 and other accused persons, as can be culled out by reading the case diary. It is further submitted that the petitioner no. 2 is innocent and he is having a clean antecedent.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIIIth, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35832 of 2019(7) dt.10-12-2019 3/3 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T