Roushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45870 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2020 Thana- INDUSTRIAL AREA District- Vaishali ====================================================== ROUSHAN KUMAR Son of Sri Bhuwneshwar Singh Resident of village - Bhagwatipur, P.S.- Sahdei O.P, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

The statement of the victim-girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. would reveal that she was aged about twenty years and she had voluntarily married with the petitioner as parents wanted to marry her with some other person of no choice.

Considering the statement of the victim, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45870 of 2021(2) dt.20-12-2021 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Industrial Area, Vaishali, Police Station Case No. 172 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T