Patna High CourtCR. REV./998/2013rejected

Sajjan Kumar Giluka v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-05-05Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.998 of 2013 (4) dt.05-05-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.998 of 2013 ====================================================== Sajjan Kumar Giluka Son of Late Mahavir Prasad Giluka Resident of Suttapatti Muzaffarpur, P.S. Town, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Amal Kumar, Principal Corresponding Address Adarsh Vidya Mandir (Sr. Wing) Administered By Textile Whole - Seller Trust, Bank Road Sutapatti, Muzaffarpur

3. Rajesh Kumar, Teacher Corresponding Address Adarsh Vidya Mandir (Sr. Wing) Administered By Textile Whole - Seller Trust, Bank Road Sutapatti, Muzaffarpur

4. S.N. Ojha, Teacher Corresponding Address Adarsh Vidya Mandir (Sr. Wing) Administered By Textile Whole - Seller Trust, Bank Road Sutapatti, Muzaffarpur

5. Udhishthir Raj Pahuja, Secretary Corresponding Address Adarsh Vidya Mandir (Sr. Wing) Administered By Textile Whole - Seller Trust, Bank Road Sutapatti, Muzaffarpur

6. Naresh Kumar Poddar, Deputy President Corresponding Address Adarsh Vidya Mandir (Sr. Wing) Administered By Textile Whole - Seller Trust, Bank Road Sutapatti, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2015 The petitioner is aggrieved with the order of dismissal dated 07.08.2013 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffrpur in Complaint Case No. 3277 of 2012. It has been submitted on behalf of the complainant that the Magistrate had considered the complaint though he was holding the trial and hence the order under Section 203 Cr. P.C is bad in law.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.998 of 2013 (4) dt.05-05-2015 However, having looked into the allegations in the complaint petition, I find it is not fit to sustain and hence is rejected.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T