Md. Jahir, v. The State Of Bihar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14352 of 2021 ====================================================== Md. Jahir, Son of Md. Juhi, Resident of Village and Post - Muriya, Ward No. 1, P.S. - Sadar Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, the Department of Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Commissioner, Darbhanga.
3.
The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.
4.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Darbhanga.
5.
The Supply Officer, Muriya Block, Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Lalit Kishore ( Ag ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) Date : 17-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
2/5 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states
3/5 that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the licensing authority to consider and decide the representation which the petitioner shall be filing for redressal of the grievance(s).
Learned counsel for the respondents states that if such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose it of expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of its filing along with a copy of this order.
Statement accepted and taken on record.
As such, petition stands disposed of in the following terms:- (a) Petitioner shall approach the licensing authority i.e. Respondent No. 4, namely, The Sub Divisional Officer, Darbhanga by filing a representation for redressal of the grievance(s);
(b) The authority concerned shall consider and dispose it of expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a period of three months from the date of its filing along with a copy of this order;
4/5 (c) Needless to add, while considering such representation, principles of natural justice shall be followed and due opportunity of hearing afforded to the parties;
(d) Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law; (e) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch; (f) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court, if the need so arises subsequently on the same and subsequent cause of action;
(g) We have not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter. All issues are left open; (h) We expect that the appropriate authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's application/request expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of its presentation. The petition stands disposed of in the
5/5 aforesaid terms.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Sujit/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 19.01.2022 Transmission Date