← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40040/2024dismissed

Guddu Sharma @ Navlesh Sharma @ Ajit Sharma @ Mottu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-19Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40040 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2020 Thana- BHAGWANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Guddu Sharma @ Navlesh Sharma @ Ajit Sharma @ Mottu S/o Late Nageshwar Singh Resident of Village Mokar, P.S.-Karauna O.P, District -Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No. 54 of 2020 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 386, 387, 120(B), 506 of the IPC and Sections 18, 20 of the UAP Act and Sections 25(1-b), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier the bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 23.12.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 55409 of 2022 which reads as follows:- Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40040 of 2024(2) dt.19-07-2024 2/3 Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No. 54 of 2020 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 386, 387, 120B, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 18 and 20 of the UAP Act and Sections 25(1-b), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is accused in ten criminal cases from before. In the present case he is accused of demanding extortion from the brick kiln owners.

It seems that he is a member of Naxalite Gang.

Considering the allegations and the criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

The District Judge, Nawada, Jehanabad, Gaya and Patna are directed to get the trial of the petitioner expedited in the following cases:- (I) Sirdala P.S. Case No. 264 of 2019.

(II) Jehanabad(Muffasil) P.S. case No. 102 of 2001.

(III) Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 412 of 2016.

(IV) Rajauli P.S. Case No. 197 of 2017.

(V) Badeya P.S. Case No. 12/2017.

(VI) Barachatti P.S. Case No. 139/2018 (VII) Rajauli P.S. Case No. 263/2018.

(VIII) Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 212/2019.

(IX) Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 162/1999.

(X) Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 277/2016.

It is expected that the trial of the petitioner shall be concluded at the earliest.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40040 of 2024(2) dt.19-07-2024 3/3 Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Judge, Nawada, Jehanabad, Gaya and Patna through FAX and e-Mail for its compliance forthwith.

4. No ground for review is made out, therefore, this application is again dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Guddu/- U T