Amrish @ Amrish Singh @ Ambrish Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44049 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-837 Year-2019 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Amrish @ Amrish Singh @ Ambrish Singh Son of Late Suresh Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla - Maa Durga Nagar Near Guru Basisth Vidyalaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Pankaj Kumar Sinha Son of Late Shankar Dayal Resident of Village - Block Colony besides Primary School, P.S.- Aurangabad Town, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. Anita Kumari, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the complainant.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution based on the complaint petition is that the complainant watned to run a business of aluminium foil container. The petitioner was paid a sum of Rs.27,60,000/- and he was introduced by co-accused Pankaj Kumar Sinha and Niraj Kumar Sinha but the machine never

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44049 of 2024(8) dt.18-03-2025 2/3 reached the place of informant which led to the complaint petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from same facts two case has been filed. One is based on complain and another is based on FIR and in that case which is based on FIR the bail of this petitioner has been rejected by the learned Co-ordinate Bench.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has undertaken to supply the machine if the petitioner is granted provisional bail.

6. Learned counsel for the complainant is present and he has got no objection to the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner.

7. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail with the condition that after coming out from the custody the petitioner will supply the machine within three months to the informant. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned A.C.J.M.- VIIth, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 837

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44049 of 2024(8) dt.18-03-2025 3/3 of 2019.

8. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T