Ramswari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45310 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2021 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAMSWARI DEVI W/o SachidanandSingh @ Sachitanand Singh Resident of village - Bhokari, P.s.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Present Chandrawanshi Nagar (Awadhut Nagar, Bhatarahi), P.s.- Sasaram (T), Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. P.K.Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ravi Shankar Sahay Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-04-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S.Case No. 96 of 2021.

As per allegation, the entire compensation amount of land acquisition, including the structure thereon, was transferred into the account of the present petitioner. Later on, the acquisition authorities came to know that the petitioner was not the owner of the structure situated on that land. They asked the petitioner to return the compensation awarded to her mistakenly for the structure existed on the land, but she refused and thereafter Certificate Case No. 01 of 2021 was instituted. Mr. P.K. Shahi, the learned senior counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45310 of 2021(3) dt.18-04-2022 2/2 petitioner has submitted that the said structure falls in the share of the land of the petitioner purchased from one Ashok Singh. Moreover, the acquisition authorities have already filed the said certificate case pending in the court of Certificate Officer, Rohtas, which is pending, for recovery of that amount. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection with Sasaram(T) P.S.Case No. 96 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T