Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1927 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2011 Thana -SIKTI District- ARARIA ====================================================== Anil Kumar son of Mr. Narayan Prasad, the then Block Development Officer, Sikti Block, District- Araria, resident of village- Bhaisasur (Ranchi Road), P.S.- Laheri, District- Nalanda .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Dr. Indiwar Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4.

29-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 16-02-2013 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Araria in Sikti P.S. Case No. 32 of 2011 registered for offence under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

On perusal of paragraph - 2 of the petition, it is evident that earlier the petitioner had approached this Court for quashing of entire criminal proceeding in the present case i.e. Sikti P.S. Case No. 32 of 2011 (G.R. No. 1172 of 2011), which stood dismissed on 04-05-2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1927 of 2016 (4) dt.29-08-2016 2/2 Once, an application for quashing of entire proceeding, which was filed by the petitioner, has already been rejected, there is no reason to examine the correctness of the order of cognizance.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T