← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/420/2018disposed

Alok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Director, Mr. R. N. Chanthu, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Bi

2018-08-01Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.420 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2014 of 2017 ====================================================== Alok Kumar, son of Umesh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Kagari, Bujurg, P.S. Jandaha, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Director, Mr. R. N. Chanthu, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. R.N. Chanthu, the Director, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Appellate Tribunal, Vaishali, through its President Officer, Mr. Ravindra Nath Tiwari, Vaishali, Hajipur.

4. Mr. Dhiraj Kumar, Block Development Office-cum- Secretary, Block Teacher's Employment Unit Sahdei Bujurg, Vaishali.

5. Mr. Jai Prakash Kumar, Block Education Officer, Sahdei Bujurg, Vaishali.

6. Mr. Sangita Sinha, the District Education Officer, Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - Aag 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

On behalf of the respondent no.6 a supplementary show cause has been filed whereby he has taken a stand that payment has been made to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted time so that he may verify whether the entire fund have been released or not.

Considering the totality of the facts situation, the Court does not deem it fit and proper to keep the matter

Patna High Court MJC No.420 of 2018(6) dt.01-08-2018 2/2 pending. In case, further amount of the petitioner has not been paid, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to file representation before the competent authority who shall look into the grievance of the petitioner and ensure unpaid salary of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the contempt application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U