Piyush Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12093 of 2014 =========================================================== Piyush Kumar Son of Sri Devendra Kumar Mishra, Resident of Village- Jhanjhwa, P.O. + P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the General Manager, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur

2. The General Manager, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur

3. The Chief Personnel Manager, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur

4. The Chief Engineer Construction, N.E. Railway, Gorakhpura

5. The Chief Administrative Officer, N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur

6. The Divisional Rail Manager, Rail Division, N.E. Railway, Varansi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghwendra Sharan Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-01-2017 Learned counsel for the parties have assisted the Court. At the very outset, it has been pointed out that in view of the judgment delivered by a Bench of this Court in the case of Chini Thakur vs. Union of India reported as 2014 (3) PLJR 724, the present writ application is not maintainable, at this stage, since the matter relating to employment under the Railways is required to be first agitated before the Central Administrative Tribunal. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw this application with liberty to move the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12093 of 2014 dt.28-01-2017 2/2 Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with the liberty aforesaid.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Prakash/- AFR/NAFR U