Bipin Bihari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33963 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2023 Thana- KARJAIN District- Supaul ====================================================== Bipin Bihari Singh S/o Late Ram Swarath Singh R/o Village- Simrahi Bazar, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raja Ram Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 100 of 2023 dated 29.06.2023 for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 45.9 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from a motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. As per para. 5 of the bail petition, the petitioner is the owner of the said vehicle. No incriminating article has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33963 of 2025(2) dt.18-07-2025 2/3 recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Supaul in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 100 of 2023,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33963 of 2025(2) dt.18-07-2025 3/3 subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T