Patna High CourtCWJC/8341/2014dismissed

Lal Bahaddur Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-05Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8341 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Lal Bahaddur Sah S/o Chutahru Sah resident of Village- Basha, P.S.- Pipra District- Supaul

2. Sudhir Kumar Mandal S/o Bachhalal Mandal resident of village- Basha, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Social Welfare Directorate Irrigation Bhawan, Bihar, Patna

3. The Commissioner Koshi Division, Saharsa

4. The District Magistrate, Supaul

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul

6. The Senior Deputy Collector Supaul

7. The Assistant Director, Social Security, Supaul

8. Madhu Rani W/o Binod Sah resident of village- Tekuna P.S.- Pratapganj, District- Supaul

9. Santosh Kumar Jha S/o Shyamal Kishor Jha Resident of village- Kahra (Madanpur), P.S.- Saur Bazar, District- Saharsa

10. Ram Kishor Sahni S/o Bauae Lal Sahni Resident of village- Diyanatpur, P.S.- Vibhutipur, District- Samastipur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anant Kumar Singh, SC 15 Mr. Avinash Kumar, AC to SC 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 05-09-2016 Advertisement is of the year 2011. Post is contractual in nature. Due to certain litigation and intervention of the superior authority, the matter was delayed in engagement of the shortlisted candidates. Petitioners are demanding direction for appointment on the post of Samudaik Karyakarta. Reason for such demand is non-joining of certain person on the said post.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8341 of 2014 (2) dt.05-09-2016 Those vacancies cannot be filled up by mandamus issued in favour of the petitioners because such vacancies would be required to be filled up afresh by a new deliberation and exercise. Law is well settled in this regard.

Writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Surendra/- U