← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/438/2016dismissed

Umesh Prasad Roy And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-20Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.438 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19055 of 2014 Alongwith Interlocutory Application No. 1948 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Umesh Prasad Roy, Son of Ram Briksh Roy, resident of Village Tarwan Mangarpal, Via Sonepur, P.S. Dariyapur, District Saran.

2. Priyanka Mala Bharti, daughter of Arjun Prasad, resident of Mohalla Shivnagar (Near Shiv Temple), P.S. + District Nawada.

3. Barun Kumar Tiwary, Son of Vijay Kumar Tiwary, resident of Village Basdila, P.S. Kopa Bazar, District Saran.

.... .... Appellants

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The D.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission Patna through its Secretary, Patna.

4. The Secretary Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellants : Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate. For the S.S.C. : Mr. Kamala Kant Upadhaya, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-03-2017 Re. : Interlocutory Application No. 1948 of 2016. The delay of 50 days in filing of the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. The Interlocutory Application is allowed. Re.: Letters Patent Appeal No. 438 of 2016.

In view of the order passed in L. P. A. No. 745 of 2014 disposed of on 19th May, 2015 rejecting the identical appeal

Patna High Court LPA No.438 of 2016 (2) dt.20-03-2017 2/2 and its analogous appeals, we can not take a different view. The appeal is also dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U