Anand Kumar Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47967 of 2015 (3) dt.14-01-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47967 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2015 Thana -BOCHHA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Anand Kumar Ravi Son of Brahmdeo Ram, Resident of Village - Azampur, P.S. - Desari (Chandpura O.P.), District - Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Smt. Anuradha Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 14-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No. 23 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, four persons coming in Sumo Gold Car over took the informant and after dragging him from car, snatched the key of the car and further snatched his mobile, cash and licence.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is not named in the FIR, only on the basis of confessional statement recorded in Hajipur Sadar P.S Case No. 89 of 2015 he has been roped in this case. Except confessional statement of the petitioner there is nothing against him, as he is the brother of co-accused Anu Kumar he has been implicated, resulting, he is suffering in custody since 3.7.2015 to which the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47967 of 2015 (3) dt.14-01-2016 learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the snatched mobile of the informant was recovered from possession of the petitioner as per seizure list vide para-35 of the case diary. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P and snatched car has not been recovered and, as such, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail after completion of 8 (eight) months in custody from the date of remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No.

23 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T