Tuffani Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37609 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2019 Thana- RAMGARH DistrictKaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== TUFFANI RAM, aged about 56 years, male, Son of late Nanku Ram Resident of Village - Baraura, P.S.- Ramgarh, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party:
APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 24-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 332, 333, 435, 436, 337, 338, 323, 224, 225, 307, 153(A), 342, 160, 379, 120B, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act registered in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 16 of 2019.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against as many as 100 named and 2000 unknown persons. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation attributed to the petitioner. The only other case in which the petitioner is accused arises from the same occurrence.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37609 of 2019(2) dt.24-06-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 16 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T