Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48305/2015bail granted

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-14Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48305 of 2015 (2) dt.14-10-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48305 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2014 Thana -NAUBATPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav son of Subhash Yadav resident of village - Tarwan, P.S. - Naubatpur, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice vide order dated 24.12.2014 and 13.05.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32090 of 2014 and Cr. Misc. No. 21673 of 2015 respectively and now the petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail on the ground that up till now charges have not been framed and there is no likelihood of early conclusion of trial in near future and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 08.05.2014. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate during trial. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention and further considering that the trial is not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48305 of 2015 (2) dt.14-10-2015 likely to be concluded in near future, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ADJ II, Danapur in Sessions Trial No. 650 of 2015 arising out of Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T