Karu Thakur @ Bharosi Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37764 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2019 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.
Karu Thakur @ Bharosi Thakur, aged about 42 years, (Male), Son of Mishri Thakur 2.
Yogendra Thakur, aged about 36 years, (Male) Son of Suresh Thakur both are resident of Village - Gerua, Pursonda, P.S.- Halsi, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 24-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 59 of 2019.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners, who are Gotias of the informant, have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. There is no injury report on record to support the accusation of assault upon the informant and his daughter. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 59 of 2019, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37764 of 2019(2) dt.24-06-2019 2/2 conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives.
(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Vikash Jain, J) BT/- U T