Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8753 of 2018 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ram Chandra Singh, Resident of VillageP.O.- Sarma, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Director, Primary Education Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna 5.

The Director, Mass Education Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6.

The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

7.

The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar (GP-17) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 14-05-2024 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present.

2. Learned counsel for the State submits that this case may be decided in the light of order passed in Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 809 of 2012 followed by judgment dated 05.07.2023 rendered by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Civil Review No.59 of 2018 (The State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Harendra Mishra & Ors.) and the same may be disposed off

Patna High Court CWJC No.8753 of 2018(3) dt.14-05-2024 2/2 accordingly. The operative portion of the said judgment is extracted as under:- "As has been discussed above, as the writ petitioners had admittedly not approached this Court or the Supreme Court on or before 26.02.2016, no relief could have been granted to them. The writ petition filed by them, i.e., CWJC No. 384 of 2017, deserved to be dismissed. Accordingly, we set aside the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No. 384 of 2017."

3. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Divyansh/- U