← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51939/2015bail granted

Suhail Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2016-01-30Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51939 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -222 Year- 2015 Thana -KANKARBAGH District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Suhail Alam son of Nazir Hussain, resident of Mohalla- Yogipur, P.S. Patrakar Nagar, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashraf Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No.222 of 2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made that the informant has gone to offer Namaj and parked his motor cycle in front of Masjid and when he returned back he found that someone has stolen his motor cycle.

In the confessional statement of the co-accused the name of the present petitioner is surfaced. There is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner is in jail since

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51939 of 2015 (3) dt.30-01-2016 2/2 4.4.2015.

Looking to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner-Suhali Alam be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No.222 of 2015, subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner;

(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U