Shishupal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37331 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2025 Thana- SALIMPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Shishupal Kumar Son of Sri Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Singh Resident of village - Manjhauli Bigha, P.S.- Salimpur, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. A. K. Thakur, Advocate Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Salimpur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109,352,351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner assaulted the son of the informant and also snatched his mobile.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. The injury
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37331 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 sustained by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature. Similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted prearrest bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64708 of 2025. On these grounds, the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the fact that injury sustained by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature by the doctor and similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted pre-arrest bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna / Concerned Court in connection with Salimpur P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37331 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 No. 92 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T