Sudhindra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16207 of 2016 ====================================================== Sudhindra Kumar Singh Son of Late Barindra Kumar Singh resident of village - Soha, Post office Soha, Police Station Sonbarsa Raj, District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary to the Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna 800 001

2. The Vice - Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, District Madhepura

3. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, District Madhepura

4. The Finance officer, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, District Madhepura

5. The Principal, Maharaja Hari Ballabh Memorial College, Sonbarsa, Saharsa, District - Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and B. N. Mandal University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University').

2. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the University in which details of payment made to the petitioner under the heads of Gratuity, Leave Encashment and Provident Fund have been brought on record.

3. Learned counsel for the University submitted that now only some difference of salary and payment of Group Insurance remains which shall also be paid within one month.

4. In view of the fact that over Rupees Twenty Four

Patna High Court CWJC No.16207 of 2016 (4) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 Lakhs have been paid to the petitioner under various heads and now only under two heads some payment remains and further that learned counsel for the University has received instructions from the Finance Officer of the University to take a stand that the same shall be paid within four weeks, the writ petition stands disposed off with the observation that the same be done.

5. As the writ petition stands disposed off based on the instructions received by learned counsel for the University from the Finance Officer; if the timeframe is not adhered to, the Court shall take a strict view in the matter. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- U