Nargij Begum @ Nargij Parveen @ Nargish Begum @ Praveen v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34449 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2017 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== NARGIJ BEGUM @ NARGIJ PARVEEN @ NARGISH BEGUM @ PRAVEEN, Wife of Jawaid Alam, Resident of Village - Purnadih, Police Station - Madanpur, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2019 Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 05.03.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54219 of 2017 and allegation against the petitioner is kidnapping the daughter of the informant, who did not return. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that she has been in judicial custody since 06.07.2017 and there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future as out of nine witnesses, seven witnesses have been examined. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

It appears that earlier on submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a heart patient and her condition was very serious, the Chief Medical Officer-cum - the Civil Surgeon, Aurangabad was directed to constitute a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34449 of 2019(3) dt.31-07-2019 2/2 medical board for examination of the petitioner and to submit a report in this regard. The said report has been received, which disclosed that after treatment, she is now normal and has no problem. Further from the report submitted by trial court with regard to stage of trial, it appears that out of nine witnesses, seven have already been examined.

In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, however, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial by conducting the same on regular basis and conclude the same as early as possible.

At the same time, Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad is directed to produced the witnesses in the trial court on the date fixed so that the trial be concluded expeditiously.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T