Arakshan Sangharsh Samanway Samiti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8833 of 2018 ====================================================== Arakshan Sangharsh Samanway Samiti S/o Subhash Mani Tiwary, Resident of Village- Chegauna Ward No. 6, Cheguauna, P.S. Narkatiyaganj, District West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Principal Secretary, Land and reforms Department, Governmet of Bihar. 3.
The Patna High Court through it registrar general, Patna, Bihar. 4.
The Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna, Bihar. 5.
The Collector West Champaran, Bettiah.
6.
The SDM Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran.
7.
The District Judge West Champaran, Bettiah.
8.
The Secretary, Narkatiyaganj Bar, Narkatiyaganj, District West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chandra Kant, Adv For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md.Khurshid Alam -AAG12 ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) Date : 01-12-2020 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "I.For issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondent no. 5 to act as per annexure 2 and complete the acquisition of land for Narkatiyaganj, Civil Court. II.For issuance of direction/directions, writ/writs directing respondents to construct court building, HAJAT and to do fencing of court compound. III. For issuance of appropriate writ directing respondents to provide adequate seating place to the advocate of the Bar."
Patna High Court CWJC No.8833 of 2018 dt.01-12-2020 2/2 From perusal of the counter affidavit, it appears that necessary steps have already been taken for acquisition of land for construction of Sub-divisional Court as well as residential complex of Judicial Officers.
For the reasons as stated above, no purpose would be served by continuing the present proceeding any further, as such same is disposed of.
Liberty reserved to any public spirited person to approach the Court, if the need so rises subsequently on the same and subsequent cause of action.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 15.02.2021 Transmission Date NA