← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36285/2022allowed

Ramlaxman Rai @ Ram Laxman Prasad Yadav @ Laxman Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-21Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36285 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1007 Year-2021 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAMLAXMAN RAI @ RAM LAXMAN PRASAD YADAV @ LAXMAN YADAV S/O LATE JHAPASI RAI Resident of Village- Parsauna, P.S.- Tarkauliya, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 327, 384, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner along with other co-accused persons is said to have demanded ransom and threatened to commit the murder of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36285 of 2022(2) dt.21-11-2022 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner is quite innocent and committed no offence. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegations levelled against the petitioner. He submits that there is land dispute between the parties. He further submits that petitioner have three criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is land dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No.1007/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T