Patna High CourtCWJC/1749/2016disposed

Dr. Ram Dayal Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-28Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1749 of 2016 =========================================================== Dr. Ram Dayal Ram, Son of Late Khekhar Ram, Resident of Village & P.O.- Pakri Mohammad, P.S.- Amnaur, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary cum Executive Director, State Health Society, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The State Health Society, Bihar through its Executive Director at Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, P.O.- B.V. College, District- Patna.

5. The Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar at Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, P.O.- B.V. College, District- Patna.

6. The District Health Society, Sheohar, through Civil Surgeon cum Member Secretary, Sadar Hospital, Sheohar.

7. The District Magistrate cum President, District Health Society, Sheohar.

8. The Civil Surgeon cum Member Secretary, District Health Society at Sadar Hospital, Sheohar.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish, SC-15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-08-2017 None appears for the petitioner.

Mr. Kumar Manish, learned SC-25, appears to submit that the petitioner has come before this Court seeking a direction to the authorities to complete the selection process so initiated vide Advertisement No. 233, which relates to appointment on posts including the post of District Programme Officer but the said advertisement has since been cancelled vide order bearing Memo No. 97 dated 23.1.2015 placed at Annexure 'C'.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1749 of 2016 dt.28-08-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the State and in view of the position explained at Annexure 'C' to the counter affidavit, the issue raised in the writ petition has become infructuous and the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Surendra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 01.09.2017 Transmission Date NA