Haidar Ali v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9527 of 2018 ====================================================== Haidar Ali son of Hadisur Rahaman, resident of Village- Chakiya, Post Office- Raghai, Police Station- Siwaipatti, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Director, Department of Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur.

6.

The Block Education Officer, Minapur, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyank Samdarshi, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.s.K.Ranjan, AC to GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 09-09-2019 The issue with regard to termination of 82 Talimi Markaj was considered by this Court in CWJC No. 10931 of 2018 and vide order dated 2.7.2019, the writ petition was allowed and considering the fact that no order visiting evil or civil consequence can be passed without compliance of principle of natural justice, the order dated 25.1.2018 impugned in that case was quashed.

In view of the above, the present writ petition is allowed. The order impugned contained in Annexure-5/1 is quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9527 of 2018(3) dt.09-09-2019 2/2 However, this order will not come in the way of the respondents in taking fresh decision after opportunity of hearing in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U