← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9830/2024disposed

Rajan Kumar Tripathi @ Rajan Tripathi v. The Central Bank Of India

2024-07-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9830 of 2024 ====================================================== Rajan Kumar Tripathi @ Rajan Tripathi S/o- Girija Kishore Tripathi R/oVillage Kaparpura, P.S. kati, Distt- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Central Bank of India through its Regional Manager a body corporate constituted under the banking companies (acquisition and Transfer of undertaking) Act, having its central office at Chandramukhi Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021.

2.

The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur. 3.

The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Pupri Branch, Distt- Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For Central Bank of India :

Mr.Sumit Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions in the nature of mandamus for commanding and directing the Respondent authorities to implement the award dated 18.12.2007 passed in reference case no. 5(c) of 2005 by the Industrial Tribunal, Patna, whereby and whereunder the learned tribunal has reinstated the Petitioner service as a peon in subordinate cadre of the Bank.

(ii) For further directing to the respondent authorities to make payment

Patna High Court CWJC No.9830 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 2/2 of his all-previous due wages of his employment at the rate revised time to time by Ministry of Labour, Govt of India as in date to the Petitioner with immediate effects for his livelihood to the Petitioner which have been stopped from February 2022."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U