Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49029/2015bail granted

Chotu Kumar @ Navneet Kumar @ Nauneet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-01Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49029 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -105 Year- 2015 Thana -BIKRAM District- PATNA ======================================================

1. CHOTU KUMAR @ NAVNEET KUMAR @ NAUNEET KUMAR Son of Rajendra Rai, resident of village - Majhanpura, P.S. -Bikram, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.S. Chaudhary (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 448, 323, 324, 326, 504 and 307/34 of the I.P.C and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, from possession of the petitioner one loaded country made pistol and six other cartridges were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 08.06.2015 and against him there is only one more case wherein he is on bail and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49029 of 2015 (3) dt.01-02-2016 2/2 The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that now the petitioner by remaining in custody has been sufficiently penalized. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Randhir Kumar, J.M. 1st Class, Danapur, District-Patna in Bikram P.S. Case No. 105 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T