Patna High CourtMJC/1959/2014disposed

Babu Nand Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-23The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1959 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2950 of 2013 ====================================================== Babu Nand Singh Son of Late Ramprit Singh Resident of Village Mahua Bigha, P.O- Obra, District- Aurangabad ( Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary namely Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. Mr. Manish Kumar, the Registrar, Co- Operative Deptt., New Secretariat, Patna.

3. Mr. Indevar Pathak, the Managing Director, The Central Co- Operative Bank, Aurangabad.

4. Mr. A.K. Singh, The Regional Commissioner, Provident fund Organisation, R- Block, Patna.

5. Mr. Ashish Kumar, the District Magistrate, Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sandeep Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 23-05-2017 On 24.09.2013, C.W.J.C. No. 2950 of 2013 was disposed of by this Court directing the Regional Commissioner, Provident Fund Organization, Patna to pay the Provident Fund dues and fix monthly pension.

Now, from the show cause filed by the Regional Commissioner, Provident Fund Organization, Patna and the averments made in paragraph 4 thereof, it is clear that the Provident Fund dues of the petitioner has been calculated and the amount of Rs. 6,81,756/- has been paid to the petitioner vide

Patna High Court MJC No.1959 of 2014 (3) dt.23-05-2017 2/2 cheque on 08.08.2014 and his monthly pension has also been fixed vide PPO No. BRPAT00038903 at Rs. 1677/- per month. The arrears have also been paid and deposited in the bank account of the petitioner as is evident from Annexure-A of the show cause. That being so, as the Regional Commissioner, Provident Fund Organization, Patna has complied with the order passed by this Court, no further action is required to be taken in the matter.

In case, the petitioner has any grievance in the manner in which the computation has been done, liberty is available to the petitioner to act in accordance with law. With the observations above, the application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Shageer/- U