Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5123 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2016 Thana- SHEKHPURA COMPLAINT CASE District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Ajay Kumar son of Kedar Ram, resident of Mohala- Tarchha, Police Station and District- Sheikhpura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Sunil Kumar, Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Sheikhpura, Police Station and District- Sheikhpura 3.
Awadh Kishore Singh @ Awadh Kishore, City Manager, Nagar Parishad, Sheikhpura, Police Station and District- Sheikhpura 4.
Awadhesh Kumar Sinha @ Awadhesh Kumar, Head Clerk, Nagar Parishad, Sheikhpura, Police Station and District- Sheikhpura 5.
Vikky Anand Sharma @ Vikky Anand, Assistant, Nagar Parishad, Sheikhpura, Police Station and District- Sheikhpura 6.
Devendra Prasad, son of Baldeo Mahto, resident of Mohalla- Hasanganj, Ward No.4, Post Office and Police Station- Sheikhpura, DistrictSheikhpura. 7.
Mahendra Prasad, son of Late Ramdhani Mahto, 8.
Birendra Kumar @ Billa, son of Mahendra Prasad, O.P. Nos. 7 and 8 residents of Mohalla- Khandpar, Post Office + Police Station and DistrictSheikhpura. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vidya Sagar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. This petition has been filed for quashing/setting aside the composite order dated 25.10.2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sheikhpura in Revision Case No. 11 of 2016 with Revision Case No. 13 of 2016.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5123 of 2017(10) dt.05-05-2026 2/2
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take all the points as raised in this petition, before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.
5. In view of the above, this case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T