← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47327/2015rejected

Ajay @ Jitendra Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-29The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47318 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2015 Thana -KORANSARAI District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Rakesh Gond @ Laddu Son of Late Rajendra Prasad Gond, Resident of village- Nagpura (Tikadewari), P.S.- Chitbaragaon, District- Balia, U.P. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.47327 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2015 Thana -KORANSARAI District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Ajay @ Jitendra Sahani Son of Rajan Sahani Resident of Village Nagpura (Tikadewari P.S. Chitbaragaon, District Balia U.P) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.47318 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suman Kri Singh(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.47327 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Suman Kumari Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-10-2015 These applications are made under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accusedpetitioners, namely, Rakesh Gond @ Laddu and Ajay @ Jitendra Sahani, in connection with Koramsarai Police Station Case No. 59 of 2015, under Sections 411/413/414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the above application and materials on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47318 of 2015 (3) dt.29-10-2015 2/2 record.

Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State. Considering the nature of incriminating materials available against the accused above-named, this Court is of the view that at this stage, the accused above-named shall not be allowed to go on bail.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for bail is hereby rejected at this stage. These bail applications stand disposed of accordingly. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) K.C.jha/- U T