Rakesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.
Rakesh Prasad Son of Late Gupteshwar Ram, resident of Village - Ishak Bigha, Police Station- Pouthu in the district of Aurangabad. 2.
Talat Noman Siddique, Son of Late Kalimullah, resident of Village - Mahri, Police Station- Bandeya in the district of Aurangabad. 3.
Vikash Kumar, Son of Late Pankaj Kumar Singh, resident of Village - Indrar, Police Station- Pouthu in the district of Aurangabad. 4.
Ramanuj Kumar, Son of Late Sahdeo Thakur, resident of Village - Raipura, Police Station- Aurangabad in the district of Aurangabad. 5.
Masihur Rahman, Son of Late Rezaur Rahman, resident of Village - Kasma, Police Station- Kasma in the district of Aurangabad. 6.
Sriom Kumar, Son of Late Mithilesh Prasad Singh, resident of Village - Malwan, Police Station- Khudawan in the district of Aurangabad. 7.
Anand Singh, Son of Late Narayan Singh, resident of Village - Magrawan, Police Station- Madanpur in the district of Aurangabad. 8.
Brajesh Kumar, Son of Late Shesh Narayan Yadav, resident of Village - Akbarpur, Police Station- Daudnagar in the district of Aurangabad. 9.
Dhiraj Kumar Singh, Son of Late Munib Singh, resident of Village - Chamardiha, Police Station- Aurangabad in the district of Aurangabad. 10.
Ahmad Raja, Son of Late Zafar Alam, resident of Village - Azad Nagar, Ward No. 14, Police Station- Aurangabad in the district of Aurangabad. 11.
Rakesh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Bashishth Singh, resident of Village - Amba Road, Deo, Police Station- Deo in the district of Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5.
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad. 6.
The District Education Officer, Aurangabad.
7.
The District Programe Officer (Estb.), Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20 ========================= ============================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Patna High Court CWJC No.12 of 2021(2) dt.22-03-2022 2/2 ORAL ORDER 22-03-2022 Heard the parties.
The case is being taken up from defect side.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to submit the original petition along with attested affidavits and also remove all the defects pointed out by the Registry within two weeks from today.
Considering it that this matter is covered by the Judgment dated 23.02.2022, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5489 of 2020 (Suresh Ram Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and connected matters reported in 2022 (2) B.L.J., 381 and the Judgment dated 07.03.2022, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 34 of 2022 (Minakshi @ Sushre Minakshi & Anr. Vrs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), this petition is disposed of with the above terms.
If an appeal is preferred before the District Appellate Authority/ State Appellate Authority, the same shall be taken up at the earliest and preferably decided within a period of three months.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) pravinkumar/- U