← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36019/2026bail granted

Mohan Kumar @ Priyanshu Kumar Ray @ Mohan Kaur v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-08Mrs. Justice Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36019 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Mohan Kumar @ Priyanshu Kumar Ray @ Mohan Kaur Son of Jitendra Ray R/o - Dahibhatta, P.S - Uchkagaon, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kr. Singh,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 100/2026, registered under section 309(4) of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Allegation in the F.I.R is that 3-4 miscreants looted the informant and took away his mobile, ATM as also some cash.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. His name has transpired during the course of investigation on the disclosure made by spy. No incriminating article has been recovered from his physical and conscious possession and he had also not been subjected to T.I. parade. He has further submitted that the recovery of two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36019 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026 2/2 mobile phones has been shown during the course of investigation on the basis of his confessional statement, however, the said fact is not correct one and it was other coaccused persons who had some role to play in the said case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 19.03.2026. The investigation has almost come to a close.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the state.

6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that the name of the petitioner has surfaced during the course of investigation coupled with the fact that he has a clean antecedent and undertakes to co-operate in the proceedings before the court, petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 100/2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T