Md. Sheru @ Sheru @ Umar Faruque v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48081 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -427 Year- 2013 Thana -KATIHAR District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Md. Sheru @ Sheru @ Umar Faruque, Son of Md. Imam, resident of Village- Narayanpur, P.S.- Manihari, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER -------------- 30-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Katihar Town P.S. Case No.427 of 2013 registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. as Katihar Town P.S. Case No.427 of 2013 was instituted under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code against seven unknown. The name of the petitioner has transpired in course of investigation in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Md. Mobarak alias Md. Mubarak. Except that, there is nothing against the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48081 of 2015 (2) dt.30-10-2015 2/2 to connect him in the commission of the alleged offence. The petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2014 but he has not been put on T.I. Parade as yet while the informant has claimed to identify the culprits on seeing them again.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Katihar Town P.S. Case No.427 of 2013. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T