Bino Yadav @ Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36069 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2021 Thana- BAKHTIARPUR District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.

Rekha Devi Wife Of Bino Yadav @ Vinod Yadav R/O Village- Sukhasan, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa 2.

Rinka Kumari @ Rinku Devi Wife Of Subhash Yadav R/O VillageSukhasan, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36754 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2021 Thana- BAKHTIARPUR District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.

Bino Yadav @ Vinod Yadav Son Of Rupi Yadav Resident Of VillageSukhasan, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa 2.

Subhash Yadav Son Of Bino Yadav @ Vinod Yadav Resident Of VillageSukhasan, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36069 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36754 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36069 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 It is a case of dowry death due to non fulfillment of dowry demand. It is alleged that petitioners had killed and disposed off the body of the daughter of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are in-laws of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners live separately from the deceased and they have no concern with the day-to-day affairs of the daughter of the informant and her husband.

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Bakhtiyarpur (Kanaria O.P) P.S. Case No. 307 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) nirajkrs/- U T