Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46298 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2011 Thana- BIND District- Nalanda ====================================================== Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash Kumar Son of Shree Niwash Sharma Resident of Village - Katru Bigha, P.S. - Parwalpur, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Gaurav Govind, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Bind P.S. Case No. 67 of 2011 for the offences punishable under sections 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier filed Cr. Misc. No. 13443 of 2012 for grant of Anticipatory Bail which was rejected vide order dated 19.7.2012. The petitioner then renewed prayer for Anticipatory Bail by filing Cr. Misc. bearing token no. 87940 of 2015 but due to some defect the Cr. Misc. no. was not generated. Accusation against the petitioner is that being agent of Aviva Life Insurance who was acquaintance with the pass word of the employees of the bank and by misusing the pass word, he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46298 of 2021(2) dt.25-03-2022 2/2 has transferred Rs. 1,32,000/- from the different accounts. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner being agent of the insurance company was supposed to know the password, hence the Branch Manager, in order to shift his burden, has made accused to the petitioner.
Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that no new ground has come on record, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Ravi/- U T