← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1115/2022disposed

Prabhat Kumar Sinha v. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Secretariat

2023-09-22Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1115 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6808 of 2021 ====================================================== Prabhat Kumar Sinha Son of Late Madan Mohan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla - Jhil Ganj, New Godown, P.O. - G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District - Gaya (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Mr. Amir Subhani, the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Secretariat Patna. 2.

Mr. Mihir Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

Mr. S. Siddhartha, the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4.

Mr. Sunil Chauvan, the District Magistrate, Aurangabad, Bihar. 5.

Mr. Vishnu Charan Gupta, the Block Development Officer, Kutumba Block, P.O. and P.S. - Kutumba, District - Aurangabad, Bihar. 6.

Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh Principal Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Alok (SC7) For the AG :

Mr. Chaitanya Swaroop, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-09-2023 Supplementary show cause along with affidavit is stated to have been filed in the Registry. The same has not been tagged to the present MJC-contempt petition. While taking note of the prayer portion of the State counsel's petition copy, it is evident that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed in so far as extending the benefit of 7th Pay Commission w.e.f. from 01.01.2016. His pay has been re-fixed and so also pension has been re-fixed as is evident from paragraphs 8 to 10. Further, it is

Patna High Court MJC No.1115 of 2022 dt.22-09-2023 2/2 noticed that the petitioner is alleged to have remained absent from 01.01.2016 till 31.07.2018, the date on which it was due for retirement.

2. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings of present MJC-contempt petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority if any other service benefit was required to be extended to him. If such a request is made by the petitioner in writing, the same shall be considered and suitable order be passed and communicated at the earliest. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) Vikash/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date Transmission Date N/A