← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37520/2025bail rejected

Md Rahmat Ansari @ Md Rahmat Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37520 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Md Rahmat Ansari @ Md Rahmat Ali S/o Samid Ansari Resident of VillageGiaganj, P.S.- Kasba, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, A.P.P.

Mr. N. Hasan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 304 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant was returning home with his wife on motorcycle, petitioner and one unknown accused person came from behind on a motorcycle and snatched his mobile phone kept in the pocket of the shirt. It is alleged that during the course of snatching of mobile phone, informant's motorcycle got unbalanced and his wife fell down and sustained head injuries and she died during treatment.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37520 of 2025(3) dt.09-09-2025 2/2 implicated in this case due to old enmity. Parties have compromised the case and a compromise petition has also been filed in the court below. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR with specific allegation that he snatched mobile phone of the informant.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T