Rajeev Krishna v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39467 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-921 Year-2022 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Rajeev Krishna Son Of Laliteshwar Kumar Singh Village- Shiv Kripa Nikunj Mohalla Rajeev Nagar, Road No. 24, Ps- Rajeev Nagar, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Tanya Kumari Wife Of Rajeev Krishna Village- Rajput Colony Road No. 03, House No. 118, Ps- Industrial Area, Hajipur Dist- Vaishali ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, A.P.P.

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and opposite party no.2.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that opposite party no.2 filed Maintenance Case No. 121 of 2020 dated 13.11.2020 within a year of marriage and pursuant to order dated 23.9.2022, passed by the Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur, petitioner is regularly paying Rs. 15000/- per month to opposite party no.2 without fail. Subsequently, maintenance case has been disposed of vide order dated 1.10.2024 enhancing the maintenance amount to Rs.20,000/- per month from the date of filing the application dated 13.11.2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39467 of 2024(6) dt.16-01-2025 2/2 Petitioner has filed Cr. Revision No.1007/2024 against the said order which is pending consideration before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 does not controvert the aforesaid facts.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Complaint Case No. 921/2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T