Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35445 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh S/o Kameshwar Singh R/o Village - Dharupur, P.S - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayashankar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 22(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, 90 pcs injections of Buprenorphine 2ml, 60 pcs injections of Diclofenac sodium injection I.P. leefort, 70 pcs injections of Pheniramine maleate avil and 100 pcs of dispovan single use injections were recovered. It is further alleged that on the disclosure of this petitioner, a shop of one Satyam Anand was searched and from there, various intoxicating drugs were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35445 of 2026(3) dt.06-07-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that while making seizure, Sections 105 and 42 of B.N.S.S. have not been complied and the seizure list witnesses are police personnel. It has also been submitted that the quantum of the drugs which have been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is less than small quantity. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.01.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T